Search Fund vs Self-Funded Search: Complete 2026 Comparison Guide
Comprehensive comparison of traditional search funds and self-funded searches. Learn the capital requirements, ownership economics, investor involvement, and which path is right for your acquisition goals.
Search Fund vs Self-Funded Search: Which Path to Business Ownership?
The entrepreneurship through acquisition (ETA) community has two dominant models for finding and buying a small business: the traditional search fund and the self-funded search. Both lead to the same destination—owning and operating a profitable SMB—but the journey looks very different.
This guide breaks down everything you need to know to choose the right path.
Quick Comparison
| Factor | Traditional Search Fund | Self-Funded Search |
|---|---|---|
| Search Capital | $400K-$600K raised from investors | Self-funded or minimal outside capital |
| Searcher Salary | $80K-$120K/year during search | None (or from personal savings) |
| Time to Search | 18-24 months typical | Open-ended, often longer |
| Equity at Acquisition | 20-30% (step-up to 30-35% at exit) | 50-100% ownership |
| Investor Involvement | Board, regular reporting, mentorship | Minimal to none |
| Deal Size | $1M-$3M EBITDA | Typically $500K-$2M EBITDA |
| Financing Flexibility | Structured waterfall, preferred returns | Full flexibility |
What Is a Traditional Search Fund?
A traditional search fund is an investment vehicle where an aspiring entrepreneur (the searcher) raises capital from investors to fund a 2-year search for an acquisition target.
The model, pioneered at Stanford GSB in the 1980s, follows a well-defined structure:
Phase 1: Raise Search Capital (~$400K-$600K)
- Typically 10-20 investors, each contributing $30K-$50K
- Covers salary, deal sourcing, travel, and operating costs
- Investors get the right (not obligation) to invest in the acquisition
Phase 2: Search (18-24 months)
- Full-time dedicated search
- Salary typically $80K-$120K
- Access to investor networks and mentorship
- Clear timeline pressure
Phase 3: Acquisition
- Investors from search phase get pro-rata rights
- New investors can join
- Deal sizes typically $1M-$3M EBITDA
- Searcher receives 20-30% equity
Key characteristics:
- Formal structure with defined investor rights
- Board of directors with investor representation
- Salary during search reduces financial pressure
- Established playbook and community support
What Is a Self-Funded Search?
A self-funded search (sometimes called an "independent sponsor" search) is when an entrepreneur funds their own search process without raising dedicated search capital.
Typical approach:
- Searcher uses personal savings or part-time income
- No formal investor obligations during search
- Full flexibility on timeline and approach
- Raise capital only when a deal is found
Key characteristics:
- No salary during search (biggest trade-off)
- Complete equity ownership flexibility
- No investor reporting until acquisition
- Can search while employed (hybrid approach)
Key Differences
1. Economics and Ownership
Traditional Search Fund:
- Searcher receives 20-30% of common equity at acquisition
- "Step-up" provisions increase ownership at exit (typically 30-35% total)
- Investors receive preferred returns (often 8%) before common distributions
- Carried interest structures can limit upside
Self-Funded Search:
- Searcher can negotiate any ownership percentage
- Common to retain 50-100% equity
- No preferred return waterfall (unless you structure it)
- Full upside capture on successful exits
Example:
- $2M EBITDA business acquired at 4x ($8M enterprise value)
- Exit at $16M (5 years, 8x EBITDA)
| Outcome | Traditional Searcher | Self-Funded Searcher |
|---|---|---|
| Exit Proceeds | ~$2.5M (30% after pref) | ~$8M (100% common) |
2. Financial Pressure During Search
Traditional Search Fund:
- $80K-$120K annual salary
- Health insurance often included
- 18-24 month runway
- Clear "clock" creates urgency
Self-Funded Search:
- No salary (must self-fund living expenses)
- Need 12-24+ months of runway saved
- No healthcare coverage
- Flexible timeline can become a trap
Many searchers underestimate the financial and psychological pressure of a self-funded search. Having 18 months of living expenses saved is the minimum recommendation.
3. Investor Relationships
Traditional Search Fund:
- 10-20 investors deeply involved
- Monthly/quarterly investor updates
- Board meetings (typically monthly)
- Access to investor networks for deals and advice
- Investor expectations and oversight
Self-Funded Search:
- No investor obligations during search
- Raise capital deal-by-deal
- Investors evaluate each opportunity independently
- Less mentorship/network access
- More autonomy, less support
4. Deal Sourcing and Credibility
Traditional Search Fund:
- "Funded buyer" credibility with brokers
- Investor network provides deal flow
- Professional structure reassures sellers
- Competition for deals from other funded searchers
Self-Funded Search:
- Harder to establish credibility initially
- Must prove financing ability on each deal
- More creative deal structures possible
- Less competition from other self-funded searchers
5. Deal Size and Flexibility
Traditional Search Fund:
- Typically targets $1M-$3M EBITDA
- Need institutional-grade businesses
- Structured acquisition financing
- Less flexibility on deal terms
Self-Funded Search:
- Can pursue smaller deals ($500K-$1.5M EBITDA)
- Creative structures (earn-outs, seller financing)
- SBA loans more common
- Roll-up strategies possible
Pros and Cons
Traditional Search Fund Pros
- Salary during search reduces financial pressure
- Established playbook and community
- Investor networks provide deal flow and advice
- Credibility with sellers and brokers
- Built-in mentorship and governance
Traditional Search Fund Cons
- Give up significant equity (70-80%)
- Investor oversight and board obligations
- Time pressure from defined search period
- Less flexibility on deal structure
- Must fit the "search fund" deal profile
Self-Funded Search Pros
- Retain majority or all equity
- Complete autonomy and flexibility
- No investor reporting during search
- Can pursue smaller or creative deals
- No time pressure from investors
Self-Funded Search Cons
- No salary during search (significant financial burden)
- Less access to networks and mentorship
- Harder to establish credibility
- Isolation can be challenging
- Raising acquisition capital deal-by-deal
When to Choose a Traditional Search Fund
Choose a traditional search fund if you:
- Don't have 18+ months of living expenses saved
- Want mentorship and a proven playbook
- Value the network and community
- Are targeting larger deals ($1M+ EBITDA)
- Can accept 25-30% ownership for reduced risk
- Have an MBA or similar background that resonates with search fund investors
When to Choose a Self-Funded Search
Choose a self-funded search if you:
- Have significant savings or alternative income
- Want to retain maximum equity
- Are comfortable with uncertainty and isolation
- Target smaller deals or creative structures
- Have existing deal flow or industry expertise
- Prioritize autonomy over support
The Hybrid Approach
Many searchers combine elements of both models:
- Funded then Self-Funded: Raise search capital, but take personal risk on the acquisition for more equity
- Part-Time Self-Funded: Search while employed, then go full-time when a deal is close
- Independent Sponsor: No search capital, but line up committed investors before searching
- Search + Operate: Buy a smaller business quickly, use cash flow to fund search for add-ons
Stanford Data: What the Numbers Say
According to Stanford's 2024 Search Fund Study:
| Metric | Traditional Search Funds |
|---|---|
| Searchers who acquire a business | ~70% |
| Profitable acquisitions | 69% |
| Average IRR (all deals) | 33% |
| Average exit multiple | 5.2x |
Self-funded searches are harder to track systematically, but anecdotal evidence suggests:
- Longer average search times
- Smaller average deal sizes
- Higher equity retention when successful
- More variable outcomes
Bottom Line
Choose a traditional search fund if you want a structured path with salary, mentorship, and proven playbook—and you're willing to trade equity for reduced risk.
Choose self-funded if you have the financial runway, want maximum ownership, and thrive with autonomy. Be honest about your risk tolerance and savings.
Both paths have produced successful entrepreneur-operators. The right choice depends on your financial situation, risk tolerance, and how much you value support vs. ownership.
Ready to invest in search funds or self-funded searchers? Explore co-investment opportunities on SMB Investor Network where you can back proven entrepreneurs with lower minimums.
Want to Learn More?
Explore both models and find the right fit for your investment strategy.
Download the Self-Funded Search GuideFree download · No credit card required