Search Fund vs Self-Funded Search: Complete 2026 Comparison Guide

Comprehensive comparison of traditional search funds and self-funded searches. Learn the capital requirements, ownership economics, investor involvement, and which path is right for your acquisition goals.

Search Fund vs Self-Funded Search: Which Path to Business Ownership?

The entrepreneurship through acquisition (ETA) community has two dominant models for finding and buying a small business: the traditional search fund and the self-funded search. Both lead to the same destination—owning and operating a profitable SMB—but the journey looks very different.

This guide breaks down everything you need to know to choose the right path.

Quick Comparison

FactorTraditional Search FundSelf-Funded Search
Search Capital$400K-$600K raised from investorsSelf-funded or minimal outside capital
Searcher Salary$80K-$120K/year during searchNone (or from personal savings)
Time to Search18-24 months typicalOpen-ended, often longer
Equity at Acquisition20-30% (step-up to 30-35% at exit)50-100% ownership
Investor InvolvementBoard, regular reporting, mentorshipMinimal to none
Deal Size$1M-$3M EBITDATypically $500K-$2M EBITDA
Financing FlexibilityStructured waterfall, preferred returnsFull flexibility

What Is a Traditional Search Fund?

A traditional search fund is an investment vehicle where an aspiring entrepreneur (the searcher) raises capital from investors to fund a 2-year search for an acquisition target.

The model, pioneered at Stanford GSB in the 1980s, follows a well-defined structure:

Phase 1: Raise Search Capital (~$400K-$600K)

  • Typically 10-20 investors, each contributing $30K-$50K
  • Covers salary, deal sourcing, travel, and operating costs
  • Investors get the right (not obligation) to invest in the acquisition

Phase 2: Search (18-24 months)

  • Full-time dedicated search
  • Salary typically $80K-$120K
  • Access to investor networks and mentorship
  • Clear timeline pressure

Phase 3: Acquisition

  • Investors from search phase get pro-rata rights
  • New investors can join
  • Deal sizes typically $1M-$3M EBITDA
  • Searcher receives 20-30% equity

Key characteristics:

  • Formal structure with defined investor rights
  • Board of directors with investor representation
  • Salary during search reduces financial pressure
  • Established playbook and community support

What Is a Self-Funded Search?

A self-funded search (sometimes called an "independent sponsor" search) is when an entrepreneur funds their own search process without raising dedicated search capital.

Typical approach:

  • Searcher uses personal savings or part-time income
  • No formal investor obligations during search
  • Full flexibility on timeline and approach
  • Raise capital only when a deal is found

Key characteristics:

  • No salary during search (biggest trade-off)
  • Complete equity ownership flexibility
  • No investor reporting until acquisition
  • Can search while employed (hybrid approach)

Key Differences

1. Economics and Ownership

Traditional Search Fund:

  • Searcher receives 20-30% of common equity at acquisition
  • "Step-up" provisions increase ownership at exit (typically 30-35% total)
  • Investors receive preferred returns (often 8%) before common distributions
  • Carried interest structures can limit upside

Self-Funded Search:

  • Searcher can negotiate any ownership percentage
  • Common to retain 50-100% equity
  • No preferred return waterfall (unless you structure it)
  • Full upside capture on successful exits

Example:

  • $2M EBITDA business acquired at 4x ($8M enterprise value)
  • Exit at $16M (5 years, 8x EBITDA)
OutcomeTraditional SearcherSelf-Funded Searcher
Exit Proceeds~$2.5M (30% after pref)~$8M (100% common)

2. Financial Pressure During Search

Traditional Search Fund:

  • $80K-$120K annual salary
  • Health insurance often included
  • 18-24 month runway
  • Clear "clock" creates urgency

Self-Funded Search:

  • No salary (must self-fund living expenses)
  • Need 12-24+ months of runway saved
  • No healthcare coverage
  • Flexible timeline can become a trap

Many searchers underestimate the financial and psychological pressure of a self-funded search. Having 18 months of living expenses saved is the minimum recommendation.

3. Investor Relationships

Traditional Search Fund:

  • 10-20 investors deeply involved
  • Monthly/quarterly investor updates
  • Board meetings (typically monthly)
  • Access to investor networks for deals and advice
  • Investor expectations and oversight

Self-Funded Search:

  • No investor obligations during search
  • Raise capital deal-by-deal
  • Investors evaluate each opportunity independently
  • Less mentorship/network access
  • More autonomy, less support

4. Deal Sourcing and Credibility

Traditional Search Fund:

  • "Funded buyer" credibility with brokers
  • Investor network provides deal flow
  • Professional structure reassures sellers
  • Competition for deals from other funded searchers

Self-Funded Search:

  • Harder to establish credibility initially
  • Must prove financing ability on each deal
  • More creative deal structures possible
  • Less competition from other self-funded searchers

5. Deal Size and Flexibility

Traditional Search Fund:

  • Typically targets $1M-$3M EBITDA
  • Need institutional-grade businesses
  • Structured acquisition financing
  • Less flexibility on deal terms

Self-Funded Search:

  • Can pursue smaller deals ($500K-$1.5M EBITDA)
  • Creative structures (earn-outs, seller financing)
  • SBA loans more common
  • Roll-up strategies possible

Pros and Cons

Traditional Search Fund Pros

  • Salary during search reduces financial pressure
  • Established playbook and community
  • Investor networks provide deal flow and advice
  • Credibility with sellers and brokers
  • Built-in mentorship and governance

Traditional Search Fund Cons

  • Give up significant equity (70-80%)
  • Investor oversight and board obligations
  • Time pressure from defined search period
  • Less flexibility on deal structure
  • Must fit the "search fund" deal profile

Self-Funded Search Pros

  • Retain majority or all equity
  • Complete autonomy and flexibility
  • No investor reporting during search
  • Can pursue smaller or creative deals
  • No time pressure from investors

Self-Funded Search Cons

  • No salary during search (significant financial burden)
  • Less access to networks and mentorship
  • Harder to establish credibility
  • Isolation can be challenging
  • Raising acquisition capital deal-by-deal

When to Choose a Traditional Search Fund

Choose a traditional search fund if you:

  • Don't have 18+ months of living expenses saved
  • Want mentorship and a proven playbook
  • Value the network and community
  • Are targeting larger deals ($1M+ EBITDA)
  • Can accept 25-30% ownership for reduced risk
  • Have an MBA or similar background that resonates with search fund investors

When to Choose a Self-Funded Search

Choose a self-funded search if you:

  • Have significant savings or alternative income
  • Want to retain maximum equity
  • Are comfortable with uncertainty and isolation
  • Target smaller deals or creative structures
  • Have existing deal flow or industry expertise
  • Prioritize autonomy over support

The Hybrid Approach

Many searchers combine elements of both models:

  1. Funded then Self-Funded: Raise search capital, but take personal risk on the acquisition for more equity
  2. Part-Time Self-Funded: Search while employed, then go full-time when a deal is close
  3. Independent Sponsor: No search capital, but line up committed investors before searching
  4. Search + Operate: Buy a smaller business quickly, use cash flow to fund search for add-ons

Stanford Data: What the Numbers Say

According to Stanford's 2024 Search Fund Study:

MetricTraditional Search Funds
Searchers who acquire a business~70%
Profitable acquisitions69%
Average IRR (all deals)33%
Average exit multiple5.2x

Self-funded searches are harder to track systematically, but anecdotal evidence suggests:

  • Longer average search times
  • Smaller average deal sizes
  • Higher equity retention when successful
  • More variable outcomes

Bottom Line

Choose a traditional search fund if you want a structured path with salary, mentorship, and proven playbook—and you're willing to trade equity for reduced risk.

Choose self-funded if you have the financial runway, want maximum ownership, and thrive with autonomy. Be honest about your risk tolerance and savings.

Both paths have produced successful entrepreneur-operators. The right choice depends on your financial situation, risk tolerance, and how much you value support vs. ownership.


Ready to invest in search funds or self-funded searchers? Explore co-investment opportunities on SMB Investor Network where you can back proven entrepreneurs with lower minimums.

Want to Learn More?

Explore both models and find the right fit for your investment strategy.

Download the Self-Funded Search Guide

Free download · No credit card required